Ina Fried, Recode:
A federal jury in the Apple-Samsung case delivered a mixed
The panel ruled that various Samsung products infringed on two
patents that Apple had sued over in its latest patent case and
found damages on a third patent, awarding more than $119.6 million
in damages. However, it found Apple did not infringe on two other
patents and also awarded Samsung $158,400, saying Apple infringed
on a Samsung patent.
It was never about the money for Apple. Even if Apple had been awarded the full $2.2 billion it asked for, the truth is that’s just not that much money in the grand scheme of the post-PC market. But $120 million? That’s chump change to either company.
It’s hard to see how anything related to this verdict would give Samsung pause before copying Apple in the future. The financial penalty was a mere pittance, and in terms of public perception, they clearly had no shame to begin with.
That said, I still don’t think Apple has any regrets about pursuing this case. It’s about the message it sends to all competitors, not just Samsung: We are irrationally protective of our work, and if you wrong us, we will go after you.
★ Saturday, 3 May 2014