By John Gruber
February openings for ads on Daring Fireball just like this one. Email for info.
I wrote yesterday that I couldn’t find a single article on iPhone component costs citing a source other than iSuppli; iLounge contributing editor Charles Starrett emailed with a pointer to Arik Hesseldahl’s article for BusinessWeek earlier this month, citing Austin-based Portelligent for an iPhone tear-down. Portelligent’s estimated component cost for a $599 iPhone: $220.
[Portelligent’s] estimate doesn’t include costs of final assembly, but it does give some insight into the gross margin on the device. Historically Apple’s gross margins have run ball park of 50 percent plus or minus a few points.
That’s just not true, unless by “historically”, he means “for a few years in the Sculley era during the late 1980s”. Apple’s gross margins are publicly available in their quarterly financial statements. Here are their gross margins for the last four years:
There is an interesting uptick in the last two quarters, but even with those two higher-than-usual quarters, the average for these 15 quarters comes out to 30 percent. That’s a lot of “minus” for “50 percent plus or minus a few points”.
Update: Here’s a table with Apple’s gross margins from 1992 until now. The average: 27 percent.
As with iSuppli, I’m not disputing Portelligent’s component cost estimates — nor am I disputing that these estimates are interesting and potentially useful. My dispute is that the sum of the component costs is significantly less than the cost to produce a product. Subtracting the component costs from the retail price does not give you the gross margin. Do Apple products assemble themselves in some sort of Willy Wonka-like magic factory?
Given Apple’s actual historical gross margin of around 30 percent, spending roughly half the retail price on components sounds reasonable to me: half the price for the components; 20 percent to assemble, package, and ship them; 30 percent profit.
Even so, it’s also the case that Apple products, and the iPhone in particular, are not manufactured wholly from off-the-shelf commodity components. Hesseldahl writes:
The most expensive component on the phone, [Portelligent CEO David] Carey says, is the touch screen, for which Apple tapped a little-known German concern called Balda. The estimated cost of $60 per unit is mostly an educated guess. “This screen is like nothing I’ve ever seen before,” says Carey.
Even the fact that Balda made it, is in fact, an educated guess. Carey told BusinessWeek that his analysis found no apparent markings that identified the screen’s origin. But Balda’s role in the screen has been something of an open secret in the wireless industry since the iPhone was first announced by Apple CEO Steve Jobs in January. Even so, Apple apparently took steps to make the source of the screen hard to identity.
So, regardless how reasonable and informed these tear-downs are, they need to be treated by the press as estimates, not facts.