Matthew Panzarino, writing at The Next Web:
The problem isn’t Samsung, it’s systemic to Android as a whole.
The makers of Android hardware see little benefit in updating
even devices that are less than a year old. And, though I think
it’s a punk move, I don’t blame them. There is little to no
return to be had.
It’s almost certain that this is what the executives at these Android device makers think, too. Why bother with software updates? We’ve got their money. Let them buy a new device if they want the latest software.
But I strongly disagree that there is no return to be had. The one company that provides a different approach — Apple — is the one company with the most profits, the most loyal customers, and its own chain of insanely crowded retail stores. Can you prove that Apple is thriving because it takes much better care of its existing customers than do any of its competitors? I guess not. But it’s the difference between a company that simply wants to sell you a device, and a company that wants to sell you a device and make you happy that you bought it. Making a sale versus fostering a relationship between customer and the company.
One company clearly has more respect for its customers; that company is also clearly more successful. If you don’t see the connection, go ahead and keep your head in the sand.
★ Friday, 23 December 2011