Not so good a piece by Paul Thurrott:
But the big takeaway here is simple. Windows on ARM, or “WOA,” as
Microsoft calls it, looks like more than a credible answer to the
iPad. In fact, it looks like something that will relegate the
iPad to the backwater of the tablet market, much as Windows did
to the Mac.
That’s simply not going to happen. Comparisons to the Mac are impossible — the iPad is now far more popular than the Mac ever was. They sold over 15 million iPads last quarter; in the old days, when the Mac-vs.-DOS/Windows war was running hot, Apple sold around 1 million Macs per quarter. I say Windows 8 should be deemed a success if it simply joins iOS as a successful tablet computing platform. It’s not too late for others to join the tablet party, but it is too late to keep the iPad out.
And they will ship with full, but touch-enabled, versions of the
coming Office 15 apps, which should be a neat final nail in the
coffin of those overpriced luxury items from Cupertino.
There’s a kernel of wisdom here, which is that the Office 15 apps should be the best selling point in favor of Windows 8 tablets versus the iPad, for those buying tablets for use as a secondary or even tertiary computing device in a job that’s already dependent upon Microsoft Office. When I travel, I see gobs of corporate businesspeople using iPads; with a real version of Office, many of those people may well be using Windows 8 tablets a year from now. It’s a genuinely compelling hook.
But “overpriced”? Really? If anything, the opposite remains the case: no one can match Apple on pricing for comparatively-spec’d tablets. Remember when everyone thought the iPad was going to start at $999? (Including Thurrott himself?)
★ Friday, 10 February 2012