I don’t really have a problem with the central premise of the
article, which is that Apple can’t grow forever at the pace it’s
been at recently. I’m not sure why such a self-evident truth needs
to take up space in the New York Times — any company that’s
growing faster than the economy as a whole can’t continue to do so
forever because eventually it would have to become larger than the
economy it’s part of — but then I don’t understand why the Times
publishes a lot of things.