By John Gruber
WorkOS launches auth.md: an open protocol for agent registration.
Jeffrey Zablotny:
This is a spot by TBWA/Chiat/Day for Apple, called ‘Photos Every Day’. The craft is fantastic, and there’s some subtle, unusual attention to detail in it.
The more I see it, the more I like this commercial.
James Russell:
As I posted a couple of days ago: Everything Is a Remix — so I have absolutely no problem with these two platforms sharing ideas and inspiration... but let’s not pretend one has struck off in a bold new direction.
(Via Om Malik, who sees non-cosmetic differences.)
Tim Cook, in an interview with Politico:
He also defended his company’s conduct. “I can tell you unequivocally Apple does not funnel its domestic profits overseas. We don’t do that. We pay taxes on all the products we sell in the U.S., and we pay every dollar that we owe. And so I’d like to be really clear on that,” Cook said.
And to The Washington Post:
“If you look at it today, to repatriate cash to the U.S., you need to pay 35 percent of that cash. And that is a very high number,” Cook said in an interview Thursday. “We are not proposing that it be zero. I know many of our peers believe that. But I don’t view that. But I think it has to be reasonable.”
Peter Bright, writing for Ars Technica:
Though the app included account support, playlists, commenting, and most other aspects of YouTube, there’s one thing it was missing — advertising. It also had two features it shouldn’t have had — the ability to download videos and the ability to play videos that the creators have blocked from mobile devices.
As a result, Google sent Microsoft a cease-and-desist demand ordering the company to stop distributing the application by May 22nd.
Microsoft’s response:
We’d be more than happy to include advertising but need Google to provide us access to the necessary APIs. In light of Larry Page’s comments today calling for more interoperability and less negativity, we look forward to solving this matter together for our mutual customers.
Peter Kafka posits that Google played right into Microsoft’s hands on this.
Kottke, quoting Vonnegut.
Outgoing Intel CEO Paul Otellini tells The Atlantic’s Alexis Madrigal that Intel passed on a chance to produce CPUs for the iPhone:
“The thing you have to remember is that this was before the iPhone was introduced and no one knew what the iPhone would do... At the end of the day, there was a chip that they were interested in that they wanted to pay a certain price for and not a nickel more and that price was below our forecasted cost. I couldn’t see it. It wasn’t one of these things you can make up on volume. And in hindsight, the forecasted cost was wrong and the volume was 100× what anyone thought.”
It was the only moment I heard regret slip into Otellini’s voice during the several hours of conversations I had with him. “The lesson I took away from that was, while we like to speak with data around here, so many times in my career I’ve ended up making decisions with my gut, and I should have followed my gut,” he said. “My gut told me to say yes.”
Curious whether that was an ARM chip — and if not, what was it?
Update: Ben Thompson says it must have been XScale, which was ARM-based.
Great find by John Sisson. Chock full of spoilers, though.
Drew Sheppard, writing for FanGraphs:
Enjoy him while you can.
J.J. Abrams takes suggestions for the upcoming new Star Wars movie from The Jimmy Kimmel Show audience. (See also: Harrison Ford a few weeks ago.)
Kevin Poulsen on the story behind DeadDrop, the new open source anonymous inbox for journalists he created with Aaron Swartz. Now in use at The New Yorker.
Brian Chen, reporting for the NYT Bits blog:
Google on Wednesday said it would sell a version of Samsung’s Galaxy S4 running its own “stock” version of Android, not Samsung’s modified version. The device will go on sale in Google’s online store, called Play, on June 26, according to Hugo Barra, vice president of product management for Android. The phone will cost $650 and will come unlocked.
DF reader Jim Lipsey asks:
Why doesn’t Google buy up a mobile device company and offer their own phone rather than resell a Samsung handset?
Great question. Why doesn’t Google do that?