Kudos to Fast Company’s Mark Wilson for having the stones to predict, boldly, that “Apple Watch is going to flop”, calling it “Jonathan Ive’s Newton”. Pretty sure he has a bad read on the battery life though:
There’s only so much you can do with sapphire glass [sic] and
power-efficient microprocessors. Current reports say the Apple
Watch could burn out in times as short as 2.5 hours before
needing a recharge. Best-case scenarios (you know, when you use it
a lot less), might stretch its life to 19 hours. But a loyal user
of the Apple Watch would be forced to take it off and recharge it
four times during a workday. That’s absurd.
It would be absurd, which is why it’s not true. Wilson links to a CNBC report for that “2.5 hours” figure, but CNBC’s source is this original report by Mark Gurman at 9to5Mac. Gurman reported:
Apple initially wanted the Apple Watch battery to provide roughly
one full day of usage, mixing a comparatively small amount of
active use with a larger amount of passive use. As of 2014, Apple
wanted the Watch to provide roughly 2.5 to 4 hours of active
application use versus 19 hours of combined active/passive use, 3
days of pure standby time, or 4 days if left in a sleeping mode.
Battery life may well be a serious problem for Apple Watch. It’s no surprise that it was and will remain one of the hardest engineering problems on the project. But no one is saying you’re going to have to recharge it every three hours. That’s so dumb it makes one think Wilson is being willfully obtuse so as to bask in the contrarian limelight for a few days.
★ Monday, 2 March 2015