Wendy Lee, reporting for the San Francisco Chronicle:
Several construction workers who were hired to build the exterior
of Apple’s new campus in Cupertino were ordered to leave the site
in January due to prior felony convictions, several union
officials and workers told The Chronicle. The ban is unusual for
construction work, a field in which employers typically do not
perform criminal background checks. […]
Banning felons could bring about legal ramifications for Apple,
said Lisa Klerman, a law professor at the University of Southern
California. “If they are just disqualifying people with felony
convictions with no connection to the job, they could be
challenged legally,” Klerman said.
I know nothing about the labor laws surrounding this, but could not the explanation for why this is “unusual” simply be that it’s more expensive to conduct background checks for every worker?
For work on the Apple site, anyone with a felony conviction or
facing felony charges “does not meet owner standards,” according
to documents from construction companies acquired by The
The “facing felony charges” prohibition is worth noting. Whatever your stance on the prohibition against those convicted of a felony within the last seven years, not hiring those merely facing charges seems blatantly contrary to our tradition of “innocent until proven guilty”.
I’m also curious whether these policies actually are “unusual for construction work” — especially for large companies. On Twitter, Greg Koenig says Intel has the same policy for its D1X chip fab in Oregon.
★ Monday, 6 April 2015