By John Gruber
Sky Guide brings the beauty of the stars down to Earth.
Edward Snowden noted the following passage from this NYT report, but it was subsequently removed from the article:
China is watching the dispute closely. Analysts say the Chinese government does take cues from United States when it comes to encryption regulations, and that it would most likely demand that multinational companies provide accommodations similar to those in United States.
Last year, Beijing backed off several proposals that would have mandated that foreign firms providing encryption keys for devices sold in China after heavy pressure from foreign trade groups. …
“… a push from American law enforcement agencies to unlock iPhones would embolden Beijing to demand the same.”
I have no idea why The Times removed this, because it’s one of the most important but so far least talked about issues in this case. U.S. culture is in many ways insular, making it easy to see this as a “U.S.” issue. But it’s not — it’s a worldwide issue.
I’ve long wondered why China allows companies like Apple to sell devices without back doors for their government. A big part of why they tolerate it seems to be the fact that no government gets this.
Update: Daniel Roberts has posted a screenshot of the entire segment on China that was cut from the article.
Update, 20 February 2016: The NYT has published a new report revisiting the Chinese angle.
★ Thursday, 18 February 2016