Joe Mullin, reporting for Ars Technica:
Following a two-week trial, a federal jury concluded Thursday that
Google’s Android operating system does not infringe Oracle-owned
copyrights because its re-implementation of 37 Java APIs is
protected by “fair use.” The verdict was reached after three days
of deliberations. […]
There was only one question on the special verdict form, asking if
Google’s use of the Java APIs was a “fair use” under copyright
law. The jury unanimously answered “yes,” in Google’s favor. The
verdict ends the trial, which began earlier this month. If Oracle
had won, the same jury would have gone into a “damages phase” to
determine how much Google should pay. Because Google won, the
trial is over.
I’m sure they’re out there, but I haven’t seen anyone who was rooting for Oracle in this case.
Update: Florian Mueller, writer of the FOSS Patents weblog, is staunchly on Oracle’s side:
Also, while Google was able to present all of the “evidence” and
testimony that helped its defense, Oracle had been precluded from
presenting the entirety of its willful-infringement evidence.
Presumably, Judge Alsup will deny Oracle’s motion for judgment as
a matter of law (JMOL), if his jury instructions are any
indication. Then Oracle will appeal again. I predict Oracle is
very likely to succeed once again on appeal.
Update 2: Mueller, for what it’s worth, has worked as a “paid consultant” for Oracle on this case. So feel free to take his support with a healthy dose of salt.
★ Thursday, 26 May 2016