Elizabeth Dwoskin, reporting for The Washington Post:
Twitter on Tuesday slapped a fact-check label on President Trump’s
tweets for the first time, a response to long-standing criticism
that the company is too hands-off when it comes to policing
misinformation and falsehoods from world leaders.
It sounds like a little thing, but I would argue strenuously against the verb slapped in that context. This makes it sound like Twitter acted impetuously or unfairly. It’s a slightly loaded word and the loaded connotation does not fit with Twitter’s very sober action here.
The move, which escalates tensions between Washington and Silicon
Valley in an election year, was made in response to two Trump
tweets over the past 24 hours. The tweets falsely claimed that
mail-in ballots are fraudulent. Twitter’s label says, “Get the
facts about mail-in ballots,” and redirects users to news articles
about Trump’s unsubstantiated claim.
Trump’s two tweets in question, and the information page Twitter’s label links to. Twitter’s information page is extremely factual.
Trump’s response (all dots and capitalization verbatim):
[email protected] is now interfering in the 2020 Presidential Election.
They are saying my statement on Mail-In Ballots, which will lead
to massive corruption and fraud, is incorrect, based on
fact-checking by Fake News CNN and the Amazon Washington Post....
....Twitter is completely stifling FREE SPEECH, and I, as
President, will not allow it to happen!
★ Tuesday, 26 May 2020