Joanna Stern, writing for The Wall Street Journal (News+):
It isn’t always clear when something is ready.
Take my grilling. Sometimes I remove steak well before or after I
should’ve. You might say it’s a “tough” call. But there’s nothing
tough about stating this: The new two-screen Surface Duo is
Microsoft’s new $1,400 book-like phone-tablet thingy is not ready
for me and not ready for you.
Unless, of course, you want an Android device that repeatedly
ignores your taps on its screens, randomly slows down, struggles
to figure out its own up, down and sideways positioning, and
abruptly rearranges parts of its own interface. If that is your
dream, well, then it is ready.
This is exactly what I thought when they let the first round of YouTuber reviews come out under the condition that they not turn the devices on. The hardware really is well-designed and the concept is both fascinating and original. But if the experience were actually good, you wouldn’t do a round of reviews that forbade talking about the actual experience.
Stern’s video, as usual, is extremely good, too — and she gives a very fair shake to the Duo for what is good and clever about it. But the bugginess of the software really makes clear why it’s better (necessary?) to control the OS when you want to invent a new form factor.
The fact that the camera is subpar is to me a dealbreaker for a $1,400 phone. I can’t shake the feeling that despite the fact that the Surface Duo is itself a phone — not just a folding tablet that can use a SIM card for cellular data — that Microsoft sees this as something one might carry in addition to a dedicated phone (with a better camera).
Also, I saw a couple of TV ads for the Surface Duo yesterday while watching football — Microsoft is marketing this.
★ Monday, 14 September 2020