By John Gruber
Mux: Turn your video
into context
Todd Bishop, reporting at GeekWire:
Amazon says it has cut off Meta’s new Muse personal AI agent from shopping on Amazon.com on behalf of customers, after attempting unsuccessfully to get the Facebook parent company to voluntarily exclude the e-commerce site from the experience.
The problem, Amazon says, is that it never agreed to any of it. Meta didn’t tell Amazon that Muse would access its store, the agent doesn’t identify itself when it browses, and it appears to capture and store customer credentials, which the company says could create privacy and security risks.
As of Sunday night, people trying to use Muse to shop on Amazon were seeing the popup, “Continued access by an unauthorized AI agent violates Amazon’s Conditions of Use, to which our customers have agreed.”
On the one hand, Muse is software, and Amazon cutting off an unauthorized software client from accessing its store seems like a normal thing for Amazon to do. I suspect Meta has protections in place to prevent other agents from acting as clients for Instagram or Facebook.
But on the other hand, an agent is an agent. If I hired a human personal assistant and told them to buy some stuff at Amazon for me, they’d just do it, and Amazon wouldn’t — and seemingly couldn’t — stop it. How is Muse different than that other than the fact it’s an AI assistant, not a human one? I’m sure Amazon’s answer is that they don’t care about the philosophical debate; they’re not going to sit back and let Meta software spider their store and aggregate purchasing data.
★ Tuesday, 22 September 2026