By John Gruber
Manage GRC Faster with Drata’s Agentic Trust Management Platform
Fascinating email to Sarah Lacy from a book publishing insider, on Amazon’s upheaval of the industry.
It’s occurred to me that Apple’s stunning successes over the last decade could be a hindrance to its ongoing negotiations with content companies — movie studios, TV networks, book publishers, etc. Imagine a weekly poker game where, week after week, the same player wins. Every goddamn week. Pretty soon that player is going to stop being invited to play. That’s Apple.
Apple’s opportunity with books is that there’s already a dominant money-winning bully at the table: Amazon.
Matthew Butterick:
In the design world, there’s a well-known swindle where a prestigious but stingy client says “I wish I could pay you, but I don’t have the budget. How about you let me use your work for free? I know it’ll be great exposure for you, and lead to paying work.” In truth, it’s not, and it won’t. Designer Jessica Hische aptly calls this “the most toxic line of bullshit anyone will ever feed you.” Why? Because it’s just good-natured grifting, an exploitation of the weaker by the stronger. Nevertheless, it works, because there will always be designers hungry enough to believe that they don’t have other choices.
Google Web Fonts uses a variation of this toxic line as part of its pitch to potential open-source font contributors.
Someone should make a list of every jackass tech site that took these Color idiots seriously simply because they raised dickety million dollars in VC funding.
Todd Haselton, BGR:
While the iPad’s lead in the tablet market is obvious, it’s becoming more clear there’s strong competition for market share below it. The Amazon Kindle Fire represented an average of 2.4 ad impressions on Chitikas network for every 100 iPad impressions, but RIM’s BlackBerry PlayBook wasn’t far behind; it viewed an average of 1.8 ad impressions for every 100 iPad impressions on Chitika’s mobile ad network. That’s followed closely by the Samsung Galaxy with 1.6 ad impressions and the Motorola XOOM with 1.55 add impressions.
Impressions per hundred iPad impressions? What a great metric for the “non-iPad tablet” category.
DF reader Andrew Wood re-did BGR’s graph to include the iPad. Hot competition indeed.
Update: Here’s another graph that includes the iPad, by Greg Scown.
I saw Ben Brooks recommend this iPhone/iPad calendaring app the other day, and I figured it was worth a shot, since I’ve never really been satisfied with Apple’s built-in calendar app. Glad I did, because Agenda is really neat. Thoughtful, clean, useful layout. The name “Agenda” really captures the appeal — the presentation is all about what you have scheduled today and over the next few days.
Plus, amazingly, it’s only $.99. With the trend toward free apps that either badger you up for in-app upgrades or take up useful screen space with advertising (or both) I’ve actually gotten to the point where I’m more willing to try a $.99 app than a free one.
Thomas H. Kee Jr., giving investment advice at MarketWatch:
In the case of Apple, this is happening in front of our eyes, and the risks are therefore very high. Apple has stopped serving their customers well, and unless they start to serve their customers better the company will begin to lose more market share and revenue and earnings projections will come down aggressively.
Most people think Apple’s customers are the end user, but because Apple relies so heavily on third-party resellers like Verizon and Sprint, both of which are feeling margin contraction and negative effects on earnings because of the extremely high cost of iPhones, the real customers are third-party resellers, and Apple is not treating them right. As long as margins and earnings are negatively affected by sales of Apple’s products, those resellers will look for alternatives and eventually they will find them. Nothing could be clearer.
Let me get this straight. Apple entered the phone business five years ago with a strategy completely different than any other handset maker: treating the user as the customer, rather than the carriers. With this strategy, Apple has now captured two-thirds of the profit in the worldwide handset market. And but now, according to Kee, what Apple should do is start acting like all the other handset makers.
Where do they find these guys?