By John Gruber
Material Security:
Stop scaling headcount. Scale your workspace.
Trust your thoughts and ideas to the makers of Google Reader. Good luck with that.
Another shocker. (Via Jim Dalrymple.)
RIP skeuomorphic reel-to-reel tape deck.
Further sign that Apple is in trouble: the iPhone topped JD Power’s smartphone satisfaction survey for the ninth consecutive time, but they couldn’t even warrant a mention in Engadget’s headline.
Finally.
Skating to where the puck used to be.
BBC News, “Apple Brand Less ‘Inspiring’, Survey Says”:
Smartphone rival Samsung is now seen as equally “inspiring” in the US, says the survey by consultancy Added Value.
Added Value is a subsidiary of WPP. WPP is Samsung’s ad agency. No mention of this in the story. Just reported as a legitimate unbiased survey. Stay classy, BBC News.
Update: The BBC subsequently added the following paragraph, but otherwise left the article as it stood:
AV is part of Sir Martin Sorrell’s marketing group WPP, whose clients include Samsung, Google and eBay.
Another one from Siracusa:
Let’s talk about the Lexus LFA, a halo car developed by Toyota over the course of ten years. (Lexus is Toyota’s luxury nameplate.) When the LFA was finally released in 2010, it sold for around $400,000. A year later, only 90 LFAs had been sold. At the end of 2012, production stopped, as planned, after 500 cars. […]
The explanation for the apparent insanity of this product is actually very simple. Akio Toyoda, the CEO of Toyota, loves fast cars. He fucking loves them! That’s it.
John Siracusa scores the mobile industry:
So who’s winning? When pondering this, I find myself thinking about dependencies. What is each company doing for itself, and in what ways does each company rely on others? I think this balance, much more than profits or market share, is what will determine long-term success. Let’s see how the players stack up.